The Actual Reasons for the Perpetuation of Internet Crimes Essay

The Actual Reasons for the protraction of profit Crimes - Essay ExampleNevertheless, despite security measures and laws against cyber crimes, such a situation of clear and inaugurate danger persists for a number of reasons. The reasons why Internet crimes remain despite the law enforced against them include the ease in which they can be committed, poor security measures, and c belessness on the part of the victims. mavin reason why Internet crimes persist is the innocent fact that they be relatively easy to commit. A teenage hacker, Nicholas Webber, is the brains behind the ?16.2M-credit card theft at Ghostmarket.net in 2009. This is roughly $25.3M of stolen consumer money from an estimated 8,000 members of Ghostmarket.net all oer the world. Webber was only 18 and his accomplice Ryan Thomas was only 17. They were imprisoned for 8 and 4 years one by one for channeling the money of the consumers to an offshore bank account located in Costa Rica (Malik, 2012). Therefore, teenag ers like Webber and Thomas who solely know hacking and banking basically already engage all the means to easily carry out an Internet crime. They can do this easily especially with anonymous programs. In fact, according to the December 2000 report by McConnell International, the occurrence of Internet crimes is caused by the following factors They are easy to learn how to commit they require some resources relative to the potential damage caused they can be committed in a jurisdiction without world physically present in it and they are often not intelligibly illegal (Cyber Crime, 2000). There is clearly a problem with Internet crimes when it comes to legalities. In fact, according to the report, there are still 33 countries which have not had their laws updated like Egypt, Italy, Norway, New Zealand and France. Moreover, there are only 52 which have definitely give tongue to laws against Internet crimes (Cyber Crime, 2000). However for the 33 countries, the vague and confusing laws simply translate as a knotty due process and a possibility of the suspect being exonerated. Another reason why it is relatively easy to commit Internet crimes is that the suspect knows that he can simply make a justification on invasion of privacy and may claim that for the government to pry on his own mystic transactions is against his freedom and right. The reason for this is definitely a confusing system of legalities governing Internet crimes, reservation such crimes irreconcilable with the idea of freedom of speech and the right to privacy. For example, How different is it if libelous and malicious statements are written on private accounts in social, in March 2006, a British woman named Tracy Williams was accuse of and charged with libel by the British court for posting false sexual allegations at an anon. online social networking site about a Parliamentary candidate that the police believed she had issues with (Darlington, 2010). It is therefore really undeciphera ble which part of the Internet crime merely expresses freedom and which part violates the law. Due to these problems with legalities, only a mere 30% of an estimated 1,600 identity thieves in the United States alone end up prosecuted and even in relatively less jail time despite the fact that 8.3M victims have been harassed, according to the FBI. Moreover, only about 1,400 cases are given attention from around 300,000 complaints about