Proposal Essay – Organ Selling

While walking down a city street, dreadful cries for process ring out through the air, and it is observed that an individual that appears to be living well has a helpless, forgetful victim held down, relentlessly flogging them to the ground and taking what little they have left for their own profit and benefit. What would be the right thing to do run away or try to help, either by stepping in or calling the prissy authorities? The morally ethical thing to do would be to help and do what has to be d whizz to stand up for what is right.This same world(a) scenario is happening non too far from this country, where pipe harmonium brokers be victimizing devoid and poverty-stricken m others and fathers trying to find a way to provide and pull out of debt, by either forcing or deceiving them to give up an electric organ or cheating them whether plantally or informally, after they agree to bewray, by either not paying them for their organ at all or only paying a fraction of the promised price (Glaser, S.,2005).But the way that nix tries to help is the same as walking by that same victim that is being beaten on the street. These brusque victimized sellers that atomic number 18 turn to that option, unfortunately are whole ignorant to and uneducated on the process, certain variety meat in their bodies, or any of the functions or importance of those organs which leaves them wide open to exploitation.Therefore, my proposal is to find a way to pick up these horrible things from happening to the potential and desperate sellers, by educating them, giving them other means that help both those who are seeking financial unclutter by selling, and those who desperately are seeking an organ to survive, and eliminating them from the b escape grocery organ brokers manipulation and exploitative grasp. It is respectfully understood that the World wellness Organization (WHO) is strongly against any payment for any type of organ donation for a number of moral, ethical, and medical reasons (Denneman, L., Mol, M. 2009).For instance, as stated in the WHOs Guiding Principles on Human Organ Transplantation (1991), organ trafficking violates fundamental human rights, much(prenominal) as rights to life, liberty, security in mostone and freedom from cruel and inhumane treatment(Glaser, S. 2005). Furthermore, it may be a risk to the public in addition to being a nuisance that, in this particular case, proves to be a conspicuously offensive impingement of human rights, because the forcing and misleading of nearlyone into selling their clay parts violates their ad hominem independence (Glaser, S.2005).Moreover, safety standards in these areas are gruellingly undermined due to the lack of resources, weak medical regulatory foundation, and corruption therefore, if there were to be a legalized method of organ buying and selling, the regulatory structures and establishment would be inefficaciously executed (Denneman, L. , Mol, M. 2009). So, on e can empathetically concur with the WHOs conclusion to stand firm on the banning.Anthropologist, Monir Moniruzzaman, found 33 sellers who went to organ brokers to sell their kidneys, not even knowing what the word kidney meant nor what its purpose and functions in the body were, and were talked into doing it because of the misleading, false information they received of their sleeping kidney and the 100% safe agency that had no risks and would cause no long-term harm or injure to them then were promised over two thirds more than they actually received (Moniruzzaman, M.2012).These people, who lived on only $2 per day to provide for a family and lived in the cudgel imaginable impoverished conditions, some in a crawl musculus quadriceps femoris located under someone elses house (Bienstock, R. E. 2013). They see thousands of luring ads in local refreshfulspapers, promising them the world, and out of fear, hope, and desperation reach out to the organ brokers and start sucked into consenting and at times physically tycoond to present (Parry, W. 2012).If there were a unbendingly regulated legal system with touch on prices that these desperately poverty-stricken people can go to ask questions, get true, accurate answers and information, and completely and independently decide to sell. This may be the stem to wipe out these brokers of the sour market because if they have no one to prey on they will not have a choice but to find other means of income besides taking a large portion of the sellers payments for hidden fees (Resnick, B.2012).Since the WHO is not, in any way, going to levy the ban, and one of the most efficient ways to increase the supply of operational organs for the thousands of people on organ waiting lists is to make some form of donation and selling legal, other options must be sought-after. By combining two opposingviewpoints it is possible for a whole new approach to this rapidly growing problem to transpire, for there may be more agre eable aspects than what meets the eye. Though there are areas of disagreement, it is agreed upon that exploiting the poor and manipulating and/or forcing them to sell their organs at the expense of their health physically and psychologically, and social stance as well as the sellers families also.Instead of going against beliefs of any party by lifting the ban or just pretending that this does not occur on a daily basis or displace it entirely, not trying to help, it may be possible to educate these poor and desperate people, crack down on busting these organ brokers, and even get the doctors involved in the protection and prevention of the honest victims that this vicious system continues to claim. The ethical and moral urgency to protect these peoples rights, freedom, health, and indecorum is every bit important, so it should be the main focal point for a new elimination program.This could consist of passing and strictly and harshly enforcing laws against such crimes related to illegal trafficking, and in the process organize public direction campaigns to get the proper and accurate information out to the victims and potential sellers so these brokers that do not get caught are unable to scam and force them to sell out of ignorance (Glaser, S. 2005). These awareness programs and information centers could then, in turn, create some jobs and give those living in drastic poverty some form of income.These farmments will require total cooperation and collaboration from both he3alth officials and law enforcement officials equally (Halstead, B. , Wilson, P. 1991). One way would be to pass the law imposing compulsory reporting requirements for doctors who suspect that the organs were obtained using the black market. Currently, transplant doctors seduce on a dont ask, dont make known regimen, which is fueling the brokers to continue luring in more sellers.Since it is the brokers who are the main culprits, it should be them, not doctors, that are pursued, conv icted, and be given a more severe punishment (Glaser, S. 2005). In addition to stopping the organ brokers there are a number of other methods that can be carried out to develop an increasing supply of organs, such as promoting consent to cadaver donations upon death, unselfish donations, biotechnology, and/or using tissues and stem cells from aborted fetuses to create the call for organs (Holstead, B. , Wilson,P. 1991).There are a number of options presented and if it is not possible to legalize the sale of organs, completely dissipate the black market, or stop people from using the black market out of desperation for either money or the needed organ, then the way the people are misinformed, uneducated, and exploited, blindly consenting by way of violence and/or manipulation needs to be straightaway addressed by carefully and thoughtfully considering getting the knowledge, law enforcement, strict punishments, and health officials help out and start standing up for the innocent vi ctims.Just as one would help if he saw a victim lying in front of him, beaten and bloody in the street, it would be imperative and morally right to lend a helping hand.