How To Write A Good Book Critique: Steps And Suggestions Essay

A give critique is a description, captious analysis, and an evaluation on the quality, meaning, and meaning of a discussion, not a support of account report, retelling, or a compact, It should (1) focus on the view ass purpose, content, and authority, (2) imply the reviewers reaction on the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, concepts, and content presented, (3) evaluate how headspring (in the opinion of the reviewer) the author has succeeded, and (4) present evidence to support this evaluation. beat 1 The first, and most important, Read the loudness. vestige 1 When you read a account book (for its educational value), take notes about it and formulate your thoughts as you go along. (You should be able to write most of your critique without looking back at the book. If you continually argon paging through the book as you write, the takings is likely to be a string of paraphrases taken from the book, rather than your make evaluation.) Suggestion 2 While reading the book dont be afraid to consult outside resources (dictionary, the books cited references, etc.) for chit and/or clarification. Include these findings in your notes. Suggestion 3 Keep in mind that your assignment is to write a 4-page (max) BOOK CRITIQUE, a abstract and analysis (not a review) of a particular books (author or authors) perspective on a selected topic, not a 20-page paper on the topic.Step 2 To begin writing your critique, start with a touch on call in 14 pt newborn clock roman type Bold, followed by your name in 12 pt advanced Times roman type standard (not Bold). As an example Summary and Critique of ( main title of the book you read)Submitted by (your name)Step 3 Using the following format, chance upon the book you read. Author & Author. (year of publication). Complete title of book in italics. urban center of publication Publishers name. Number of pages. As an exampleMarvin E. Lusts. (1997). How to Be Great Getting Ahead in a Humble Way. New York Deficient Press, 1997. xvii, 234 pp.Step 4 Write the introductory paragraph (or two). Without utilize a heading, provide a contextual background (such as for whom the book is intended what we know about the author the school of thought equal by this author or work), a statement of the purpose of the book (what the author or editor is trying to accomplish), and the scope of the book (how a good deal ground the author is trying to cover) you must judge what background breeding will be helpful and/or necessary for understanding the spirit/uniqueness of the book.Step 5 pursuance a left-aligned, 12 pt Bold New Times Roman heading Overview, write your summary of the book. Your summary should consist of a short, succinct overview of the contents (as opposed to a play-by-play summary of the book), identification of the main thesis or theses, a inspection of the supporting assertion/logic/rationale, description of the authors assumptions, and note-worthy statements/wordings/quotations from th e book. Suggestion 4 Dont plagiarize from the publishers, reviewers, or book sellers reviews/summaries. They are trying to promote the book, you ask to objectively describe the content.Suggestion 5 When you quote from the book that you are discussing, put the page number in parentheses at the end of the sentence. As an example The author concludes that size does matter, as all the truly prominent leaders were exceptionally short people (p. 79).Step 6 Following a left-aligned, 12 pt Bold New Times Roman heading Analysis and Reaction, write your analysis and reaction.For your analysis, objectively evaluate the book for relevance and importance to the selected topic accuracy, thoroughness, and usefulness, and the authors objectivity (is the book based on research or personal opinion?) hand over whether the authors main arguments are logically rational (based on testable, factual evidence), logically irrational (based on un-testable espoused theory and rhetoric), or split (based on emotional opinion). Comment on parts of particular interest, and oral sex out anything that seems to give the book literary merit. Additionally, relate the book to large issues. Identify precise issues the book raises and the possibilities the book suggests to you? Suggestion 6 Be careful not to criticize an author just because he/she did not write the book that you would have wanted, or because their position is based on a belief that is diametrically opposed to your personal beliefs (for example, the author belongs to champion political party and you belong to another).Only judge a book according to the authors stated (or blatantly implied) intentions. For your reaction to the book, do to the authors arguments/opinions. What do you agree or disagree with, and why. What specific points are not convincing, and what has the author omitted or what problems were left unsolved. Support your argument for or against the authors opinions with evidence (research findings or by bring i n other authors you agree with). Suggestion 7 When you quote or introduce supporting evidence from other books/authors identify the source by putting the authors last name, year, and page number in parentheses at the end of the sentence. As an example However, the research has clearly shown that at that place is no correlation between genetics and leadership effectiveness (Sommebodi, 2001, p. 79).Step 7 Following a left-aligned, 12 pt Bold New Times Roman heading Summary write a summary paragraph (or two). Close with a comment on the overall significance of this work (is it a valuable piece, a useful piece with whatever minor problems, or a waste of the trees), briefly restate your main points, and comment on whether or not you would recommend this book to others, and why.