Compare Contrast Greek and Roman Art

Compare Contrast classical And papist r do And Architecture Compare/Contrast Greek and roman letters Art and Architecture Since the onset of Greek and Roman civilizations centuries ago we have earnn the device and architectural worlds evolve into what we know them as today. In fact, many of the past Greek styles were duplicated by the Romans and modified to suit their needs. We can still see a lot of Greek and Roman influences in the present day, curiously in the architectural world. Below I will cite few examples of Greek and Roman pieces of art and a structure from each last and detail some similarities as nearly as some secernate values.Id like to begin by comparing some pieces of art. In The F eitheren Warrior (Greece) and The Dying Gaul (Roman copy) both clearly represent a tragic event. Both military issues are leaning on the ground and depend to be dying but the reality of the event is more(prenominal) bare in the Gaul sculpture. The wound is clearly visible an d the anguish of the subject is captured in his poise. Conversely the subject of the Warrior piece looks rather content and shows no visible injury. Both effects are roughly the same size and represent a relatively perfect gentle structure with prudence to muscular detail as considerably as an idealization of the human body.However, the Warrior sculpture shows less optical fact and more stylization as far as the eyes, mouth and beard are concerned when opposed to the well-nigh true to nature elements of the Gaul piece. This shows how some of the Greek foundation was carried on but modified by the Romans. In The Three Goddesses (Greece) and Marcus Aurelius on horseback (Rome) there are many similarities. Each shows fine attention to the cloaks wear by the subjects as well as weight distribution and, if all limbs were present on the Three Goddesses, implied motion.But in the Aurelius sculpture there is a shift from strictly human subjects to the addition of a horse. The Roman s did this as vox of their love of realism along with their later concern for psychologically sharp portraits. Moving along to architecture Id like to compare the Parthenon (Greece) and the Pantheon (Rome). Upon smell at each structure you would immediately nonice the use of columns. Albeit the Parthenons main weight-bearing elements are the columns whereas the columns used on the Pantheon are more aesthetic than functional. Each of these structures also makes use of a portico that originated in the Greek enculturation.Both structures are immense places of worship to the gods. The Parthenon was created for the goddess Athena but over the centuries it changed by dint of a series of hands finally ending up as an ammunition dump for the Turks during a seventeenth century war with the Venetians. The Venetians bombed the create leaving most of it in ruins. The Pantheon was created as a house for sculptures of Roman gods. Enough care was taken through and throughout the centuries t hat this structure is still be used for religious functions today. The Parthenon was a more simplistic and ancient looking design where the Pantheon took on a whole new era.The dome came into swindle along with the many ornamental features seen on the inside as well as the outside of the Pantheon. The interior contains marble slabs and granite columns. These are accentuated when the sun shifts locations through the oculus in the center of the dome. These features reaffirm the fact that the Greek culture was to the point as far as balance of mind and body. They created their work meticulously but didnt overdo it. Their buildings were functional but not overworked. The Roman culture took it to the next level with their architectural innovations as well as their emphasis on beauty.