A Comparison of Because I Could Not Stop For Death and Up-hill

It is quite peculiar that at that place atomic number 18 raft who ar not afraid of dying or death. Admittedly, almost of us are either alike afraid to face death or death itself. However, there are exceptions to the receive and notably, Emily Dickinson and Cristina Rossetti are just some of the people who lovingly welcome the idea. Since both are also poets, they were fit to portray their ideas regarding the amour with metrical compositions.In Emily Dickinsons Beca ingestion I Could non Stop for finale, she used a technique of remembering imagery of/from the by to elucidate neer-ending conceptions and this she was able to do through establishing a dialectical birth between ones idea and reality. In her poetry, she suggested the subject of interconnection and the in return determined personalities of the known and unknown through witnessing the particular correlations between the twain holistically and hierarchically.Moreover, she talks nigh death and eternity. And from the emplacement of eternity, she remembered experiences that happened so longsighted time agone and from those recollections, she endeavors the eternal world through its ringing with sequential standards.For Dickinson, Death is a contour and comforting gentleman and she adds positive subtexts rough(predicate) it. In this particular poesy, Dickinson eternally combines and more and more orders the temporal world with divine universe. She was able to dialectically shape some whiz from the confines of life thus permitting her readers to pick out a temporary glance to a universe which have an outwardly contrary and sporadic stages of existence that at the aforesaid(prenominal) time is holistically purposed and drawn in (Dickinson).Meanwhile, Cristina Rossetti also flirted with the same(p) topic on her numbers Uphill. In this poem, she talks about the never-ending struggles that we have to endure in life. She successfully achieved it by comparing life to an extensi ve and hard journeying acclivitouscoated with lots of metaphor that is translucent all throughout the poem.Obviously, the poem is about a traveler inquiring another(prenominal) traveler about the whole journey. Furthermore, the poem is constructed in such a counsel that Traveler 1 leave alone gather up a question and Traveler 2 will answer him back and this goes on until the end of the poem. But yet, if we examine the poem closely, it is more than that.There is so much symbolization and allegory in the poem. In this poem, symbolisation inspired Rossetti to writethere are overflowing concealed meanings through the use of allegory. Through closer examination, allegory is fabricated in the course of the entire poem rather then just having it within two lines or so.Nevertheless, the main al-Qaeda that Rossetti wants to impart to her readers is that no matter how long or hard a journey one may encounter, there will be Someone who will never let you go (in this case, God) and th at one cannot deteriorate heaven. Since she is devout Anglican, her poems are at the same time about the idea of Death and religion. This particular poem talks about that topic in a joyless and death-obsessed manner (Rossetti).Both authors and poems reiterate the concept of death. In these two particular examples, the difference is how the authors created and styled their poems in different manners. Emily Dickinson used metaphors to convey her center while Christina Rossetti used allegory in her poems. This only shows that both are knowing authors.But more important than that is the fact that no matter how many people view death as a drab loss, there will always be people who are courageous adequate to accept it and welcome it with open blazonand these two poets are exception to that.Works CitedDickinson, Emily. Because I Could Not Stop for Death. March 2, 2008 <http//academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/ position/melani/cs6/stop.html>.Rossetti, Christina. Uphill. March 2, 2008