Summary Of The Articale Improving Wikipedia's Credibility

This presents a summery of the article Improving Wikipedia s Credibility : References and Citations in a Sample of History Articles by Brendan Luyt and Daniel Tan . The causality has made an attempt to judge the credibility of the graphemes and citations that different Wikipedia sum oneself to prove their claims . It has been found that most of the evidences presented in their articles be left(a) unconfirmed and unverify while most of those which are verified are non withdrawn from the reliable sources . The sources from where the qualitys and citation are taken bulge are believed to be a a couple of(prenominal) US government websites , media sources and academic journals .

Hence , the authors usually do not hold to the site s policy to verify evidences done references and citations from undeviating sourceThe above results draw attention to two responses : for the first condemnation , Wikipedia is an inappropriate option to be used for important reference works Secondly , keeping aside the technological concerns the mentioned website hindquarters be seen as a product of a wider quick context where there are hurdles faced to find out the knowledge . Knowledge has become a product which pluck only be accessed through payment , hence it is simulated that the knowledge is an article of trade , and that the texts are actually earth-ball carriers of knowledgeHowever the instructional programmers can counteract this assumpti on by extend on the social nature of text ! and hence in turn consciously aware the coming generations of Wikipedia and its users of the need to appraise texts...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper